Thank you

amazing

Good

goog

Good

I am quiet excited to be a part Coursera family. So blessed working with you all. Good luck everyone.

استفدت بالكثير من المعلومات رغم وجود أراء لم تعجبني لكن فكرة التنميه البشريه في حد ذاتها أمر مهم وجيد

It was a great course to start with some psychological theories related to learning.

Very insightful course! In my eyes, the last chapter was too in-depth and complex.

The course is great when it comes to the information provided, however, the peer-graded assessments are ridiculous and should be replaced with AI grading if they don't have better control over grading and retaliation. Many learners submit one sentence and pass, but if you fail them since they didn't meet the criteria, they fail you too, and there is no way to get support and correction of your grade, you have to resubmit and wait for several days again. Another thing is that they submit those reviews anonymously, and refrain from commenting on what is wrong, hence the frustration. I wrote two emails to support but didn't receive a reply, and had to resubmit. I hope people who organized this course will see this comment and apply these suggestions, as these activities are de-motivating and time-wasting. Very disappointed with this part, especially since I took numerous courses on this platform, and many of them had peer reviews, but this is my first time witnessing something like this, even though there is much talk about plagiarism and failing for no reason on the internet.

The course began well, with an overview of educational theories, but the second unit on social-emotional learning focused too narrowly on the single issue of bullying, the third unit on quantitative methods focused too narrowly on one case study of the classification of English Language learners. The final unit, on brain development in adolescents and early adults was again interesting.

I found most of the information interesting and applicable. On the other hand, the material was non-sequential and felt disjointed. Each section had little to do with the previous and it seemed more like a collection of lectures rather than a well-rounded certificate program to introduce the learner to the title topic. Also, the format for submitting work was confusing and was (unnecessarily) linked to another site that made it complicated in reviewing work. And speaking of grading, too often there were not enough peers to review work. This require that sections could not be completed when the learner wanted to put in the time to do the work. Expect to return to this course outside of anticipated times or be ok with moving on to other sections without assurance of completion. Case in point: I finished all of my submitted work on a Thursday but did not receive my completed certificate until the next Monday. On the other hand, it is a short course and can be completed quicker than other certiciates I've worked on.

The format of the assignment is really hard to navigate. Also the way questions are formatted they need better structure.

Dr Kalantzis talks as though she were reading the content on the teleprompter for the first time. A jerky, stuttering delivery that distracts significantly from the content. Unenrolling.