Could have dealt more with web connection

Need to update assignments

Not that detailed stuff.

good course

пееее

good

ok

I did not feel that I learned as much in this course as in the previous courses of the series. The assignments in particular seemed trivial, and were compromised even further due to some technical problems with the simulator recommended for students without access to actual hardware.

This course would be a good candidate for revision, with a focus on gradually increasing the depth and complexity from stage to stage, and on commonly-used components such as current amplifiers and shift registers. Problems with the simulator should not be cause for compromising the assignments themselves, there are other ways to address those problems, many of which were employed by students as they competed their assignments.

It was an okay course for a beginner. However, even for a beginner I would say it needs a lot more content. More examples, circuits and code should be shown by the instructor. For a coursera course its kind of a let down considering you can find waaaay more in depth and well explained tutorials for free. The instructor himself is a good teacher but, like I said, a lack of depth of syllabus and lecture materials really hurt this course. Still it can be a somewhat very shallow touch up on arduino basics. Honestly the 2 arduino courses can be just added together as one course. Kinda dissapointed.

week 3 is in Russian.please don't register thinking it's in english.

Too expensive. You can find more information for free on YouTube.

not bad

nice

Only course in this specialization where I've had any issues with peer grading system. It's like they had 2 or more different final submissions on a coupl eof the weeks and the software doesn't accurately serve up graded projects with their correct submission rubrics. For example, week 4 asks you to code a program using PWM to gradually light a LED and then dim it. Yet many of the submissions that I saw were related to the Twython project discussed in the videos yet the grading rubric was for the LED lighting. This course really jumped all over the place with topics and how they went together as well.

A wonderful course, but the quizzes aren't unlocked until we pay up. Some of us cannot afford it and we do it only for the sake of knowledge. The verified certificate means nothing to us. You need to cater for people like us and unlock quizzes for those who are auditing the course.

The course is almost about nothing. It seems to me that the teacher didn't make enough preparations and make a lot of mistakes during the couse. After 8 weeks of Arduino-related courses I've got almost nothing new besides first 2 chapters of Arduino Starter Kit book.

Really bad explanation no code explain they left you on your own i'ts supposed to teach you not to left you undestand nothing they just teach components but the real thing the progaming is undeground no one knows that kinda weird :(

The professor was completely inadequate. Many parts were unsuitable for this course. He has eliminated the useful discussions among students without explanation.

Not in-depth enough. Just barely cover basics of Arduino and a few shields you can use, but fails to go on to build on top of that knowledge.

they had that peer rating criteria in which you have to wait weeks for someone to rate your project which is so much annoying

I'm enjoying the course! Thank you

No forum, what are you thinking!

doesn't in arabic

worst