I'll be honest here, and say I didn't think the content in the videos was that engaging, and I found some of the questions to be ambiguous and seemingly misaligned with the TOGAF 10 literature (I'm not an expert, so I could be wrong.) What would greatly improve the course is if the learnings referenced the literature in the TOGAF guide. (i.e. for this module, reference Phases A and B of the ADM model, and [link-to-the-content].

good content, but more quality controll (check slides for proper English, take a second take on audio when stumbling in the script...) would have profited. Especially, because the questions sometimes are NOT answered in the modules, but turn into a guessing game.

maybe the tutor can explain with example in real company or real process in order to we better understand about this TOGAF.

nice overview

The lecture delivery is not professional. It is more like reading from the notes. The slides are very basic and do not cover the important points. Presentation is below average. A major improvement is required to make it more engaging and informative.

Instructor was hard to understand and did not speak English on a proficient level. There was no consistent use of certains terms and descriptions between lessons and quizzes, making sometimes hard to understand the questions in the quizzes

this is not for the North American English Speaking market. It is very difficult to understand these individuals, and the transcripts aren't that much better. This is simply not for Americans. I am struggling to understand what they are saying and I used to teach English as a second language for years! This might work better in South East Asia, in India or wherever the presenters are from. This should be removed.

- I did learn some good stuff about general IT functionality. - The sound in the course ... !! especially it felt like the content was generated in a synthetic or automated way; make very hard to listen, so muting and reading makes it just like reading a book.

went through nearly 30 mins of content in first module, there was almost zero value in anything presented. There're spelling errors (speaker says "hours" and on slide it says "R", speaker says "tenets", and on slide it says "tenants" etc.)