Learner Reviews & Feedback for Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by Johns Hopkins University
About the Course
Top reviews
MJ
Jan 7, 2019
Although introductory, I do carry out reviews as a researcher. I Learned a lot to improve my systematic reviews through this course. High quality, though the music could be a little less intense.
PS
Aug 22, 2019
Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis course is a very good source for beginners which provides an overview on fundamental terminology and steps involved in the systematic review.
851 - 875 of 878 Reviews for Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
By Karla H S
•Oct 21, 2020
Great course! verry interesting!!
By Victoria S
•Jan 3, 2017
Excellent introductory material!
By Raghavendra G
•Feb 1, 2021
Step by step, and in detail.
By Ahmed G
•Sep 21, 2017
very useful and informative
By Sanjib K
•Sep 20, 2021
Excellent course!!
By Sabiha B
•Jul 25, 2024
good , thank you
By SEHA-00825
•Apr 5, 2023
Great learning!
By Prakriti K
•Feb 25, 2022
very helpful
By ARNOLD T C
•Dec 11, 2023
wery well
By Marlene F E M
•Oct 22, 2021
Excelent!
By RAMYASHREE
•Aug 31, 2023
Good
By Ankit B
•Mar 22, 2023
good
By Harshitha B
•Jan 7, 2022
Good
By Abd a R
•Apr 5, 2022
By Ziad s
•Sep 2, 2024
the course lacks the experimental part,after completing the course I can't do ca systematic review and meta-analysis on my own. Also thec ourse didn't emphasize on the how to quality assessment for included studies or how to actually get all the studies, it only gives you framework from the cochrane handbook and you should do everything on your own. So I would recommend that others should know how to do systematic review and then take this course this way they will understand it.
By R K S
•May 8, 2021
The Course is engaging and adds value to the learner. It has added many new phrases in my vocabulary pertaining to SR and MA. However, course focusses the medical professionals which needs to be mentioned in the introduction of the course.
It adds good cognitive knowledge but builds skills less. Some practising assignments would further add value to learners and the course.
By Muoneke c v
•May 25, 2023
Hello cousera, i'm elated to be part of this wonderful course. The peer review assessment is incomplete. I keep flagging it down and it is preventing me from finishing up .
What could be the problem?
By Suisin L
•Apr 26, 2018
Me gustó el curso, solo que al final, me perdí. Desde que empezó con el meta análisis.
By N.A. T
•Feb 27, 2017
Great content, but not delivered in a very dynamic manner so hard to stay attentive.
By vdk
•Jun 21, 2018
need more developement on network meta analysis, etc..
By Taima F
•Jan 26, 2020
It's good but I felt bored in some lectures !!!
By María M V
•Jun 4, 2017
Important in medical practice
By Ahmad A
•May 28, 2017
there was no notes
By Ivan H A
•Jul 29, 2024
Talking about bias!!! if you are interested in learn about meta analysis but you comming from a field different to medicine or epidemiology this is not your course, GET OUT. For the statistics they explain very, very few, and at the end didn't include the information nesseary to fully understand meta analysis data. Also, only took into account some estimations (ORs and RRs in RCT) but nothing on regression in meta analysis or network MA. The instructors mention the following introduction of softwares that never introduce at the end. I'm Marine Biologist looking to learn about meta analysis and this course was bellow my expectations. I do understand that for the epidemiologists or health care carreers it could be a perfect course, but then it would be recommened narrowing the scope on the title or the description if ther don't want to brind a wider approach on the topic. The instructor seems that they are expert on their field but from people for other disciplines it is very complicated get a good grip of the content of the course.
By Omir A
•Oct 6, 2018
Need more explination in real website, and explination of terms