Well structured and good content!

Minor point: For all who have not completed the previous courses of the program, it would have been great if the required Android studio version was mentioned at the beginning of the course.

Great content based on UML representation and high level design. The week about architectural style is particularly interesting. Only dark point is the ATAM for architecture evaluation that is not well explained.

There are some important concepts, but I think this course don't have the enough number of examples, in order to facilitate the assimilation of the concepts. But It is an good course

Content was well thought and prepared, though sometimes I would have appreciated a bit more practice/details on the topic then covered by peer-graded assignments.

It was definitely interesting at first, but later modules were quite boring as they went into philosophical level. But overall it was good experience, thanks.

Not as informative as the previous two courses in this specialization, although the links to free materials in the discussion boards helped a lot.

This course is very useful, but i think intructor need add more example in presentation.

I support student easy make assigment.

Thank you!

Very interesting course, although it'd be nice to spend more or longer lessons on some relevant and central topics (e.g., ATAM).

I felt the material was very shallow. I had to go and refer to YouTube videos to clarify understanding on few.

This course can provide more practical assignments for students to master the concepts covered in lectures.

It's introduction of software architecture, mainly focus on basic concepts, lack of practical examples.

Good Course, it clarifies important SW architecture topics and presents good examples

I had a hard time understanding how to do an assignment at the very beginning.

Very Good! However, the solution for the final assignment is incomplete!

Good content, except for the ATAM method which is too superficial.

Very Broad Expression about Architecture but I bit of difficult.

I think the course is much worse than Object-Oriented Design and Design Patterns. Especially ATAM part. It's too abstract, too hard for understanding and requires too much time. The benefits is not clear. And it seems that this process is rarely used in practice. Wasted time.

Absence of ATAM examples, that's quite unclear how the final assignment should be done.

Someone reading a text in a fast, monotone way for the entire course does not fit my learning style. The only thing I liked was the peer review assignments. That's what I learned the most: from other's mistakes and grading questions.

No meaningful feedback at all, discussion forum was useless.

Depending on self assignment is not fair if there's no enough assignments to pass the course

The peer review concept and sharing app makes every course useless

The peer-review system makes this course unbearably slow

Very boring.

Through Coursera, I have studied many interesting subjects that I haven't known before. Interesting assignments, the way to cross-check student's work and peer's work is so great. I will spend more time studying other's Coursera in the upcoming time.