good

good

Good

GOOD

ok

ok

wd

The videos are great, the professor explains well all the contents. But the test are not well done, specially the week 3 test where the first questions have some code and the line numbers of the questions does not correspond with the question. They also forget to tell you wich coding standard to use, so is very confuse to answer those questions. PS. I am a professor, I know what I am talking about.

Great overall course, few things prevented me to rate it 5 are quite a few opinionated places + testing based on specific language (C++ code styles). And painful, poorly constructed graded quiz in Week 3. The part about quality was top notch, I learned a lot about evaluating different kinds of complexities etc. Thank you!

Overall the course is clear and concise.

GOOD

This course is really good to get the grasp of the software best practices, but the quizzes and activities need to be updated since there are some metrics for evaluation peer-to-peer ambiguous and some quizzes with questions that doesn´t specify itself diagram, furthermore the are so many readings which can be comprise in videos or other references with more substantial importance and not just throw out to see a little bit about everything.

Too may assigments. It is a very complete course, but the evaluations and assigments are harder than the previous courses for the specialization.

Too many links to outer products. Awful tests, especially the one about code style. Short explanation of several parts.

There's a chunk of repetitive material, it's not been updated in a while and lots of plagarism happening

Course does not have a high cohesion.

Overall the course will point you to many external readings, with even some of the links being broken. The content covered is either very high level or way too technical. The instructor does not do a good job of bridging the gap.

Furthermore, the tests have several mistakes and do not align well to the content from the lectures.

90% of the "peers" I had to review were submissions generated by bots. It was a total waste of my time and very frustrating.

it was very technical (that is something good), but sometimes did not treat enough some topics

Compared to the first two courses in the Software Development Lifecycle specialization, Engineering Practices for Building Quality Software is of lower quality. The course covers a wide range of topics, without explaining any of them in detail. After completing this course, I feel like I learned only some random, tiny bits of information.

I completed this only because I was already on my way to getting the full Software DEvelopment Lifecycle specialization, but in retrospective I would stop at the first two courses and avoid this one

This course is not much helpful for tester people . There are very short video of 4-5 min and other are all free links which are avaliable online and can any use like guru99 and other. They are all navigating to free links only. Reading only. Also there are charging so much . Assignment are also not good.People are submiiting anyone and peer only reviwing. I will suggest please do not buy this course.Instead purchase specilization in each domain like jenkins, maven and other.

This final course requires a totally different background / prerequisite from the other courses in the specialization! It disappointingly prevents me from completing the specialization and makes me appear that I just took a random sampling of courses on the topic instead of a focused, well designed specialization.

anser not found chatgpt