This was an interesting and engaging opportunity to learn about the safety standards and practices for cobot design, implementation and operation. During the course, I noticed quite a few mistakes (numerical and inconsistencies between respective questions and answers). If interested, I would be happy to point out these mistakes for your team via email. Feel free to contact me at pbarnes880@gmail.com in the case that you do not already have someone actively revising those mistakes.

I thought this a wonderful introduction to the challenges of robotic implementation. I have been designing layouts for my Lean clients for a while and this covers the additional thinking that goes into incorporating robotics into your layout process very nicely. It might need updating soon as some of the material is getting potentially dated.

Great course! My only complain is that some of the extra videos and material make no sense or the links are broken. I would have liked to have a few practical examples explained about workcell design rather than papers as extra material.

The course provides general safety principles for collaborative robots. I find it very useful to know which is the general framework, understand the basic safety elements and have notable references. Very good.

Many of the course links for are outdated and the desired content cannot be viewed. Other than that, it was a very informative course.

This course is quite good but only thing I felt uncomfortable is about standards taught as they are very tidious to remember

Interesting content, very technical. It's too focused on design however. I would have liked some more operational content.

Good course, a lot of useful and helpful information, but it is quite superficial and lacks practical challenges.

Very good course for someone who is part of the robotics design team from safety and compliance stand point.

Very good information, tests were not proofread, but everything else was very helpful.

This course provides an excellent presentation of useful information and methods.

Please Provide more Visual notes and points like a slide show while speaking.

Great Course and meet industry standards

very good and useful content

good course

helpful

GOOD

This is an interesting, informative course on a very specific subject. It gives a very good overview of the use of robots which interact in the same areas as people. However, the course appears to be orphaned. The forums point out a few dead links and exam question errors, but no one from the course has responded in over a year.

The course was okay.

The instructor was good.

though, i expected to learn some programming for safety parameters which were not at all covered in this course. This is an improvement that i would suggest.

Great learning objectives. But poor delivery. Most of the referred articles are heavily paid articles or unavailable. The resources have not been reviewed over the years. Speakers are monotonous.

this non credited course with certification instead of having a link of id verification they should have a bar code where the employer can verified student identity

Basic course for developing your knowledge about collaborative robots. Hazards related to it and some mitigation methods.

Quite boring

Good course

The transcripts for the videos are clearly not reviewed and include word substitution errors that could possibly be made by software or by someone who has English as a second language and erroneously selected a similar-sounding word. In some cases, you can figure out what is trying to be conveyed, but in other cases it's pretty confusing. Some of the additional resources are just advertisements from companies trying to sell their robots. Some of the additional resources links don't work. Some of the questions in the quizzes make no sense, partly because of incorrect word substitutions. Other issues include a yes/no question in week 4 where the "yes" answer and the "no" answer each provided an explanation after either the yes or the no... but the yes and the no were attached to the wrong explanations, thus causing the answers to be illogical and false. Another question asks about an arm being pinned by a robot, but the answer it wants is the answer for the user's palm being pinned. The palm is mentioned in the question, but the arm is the part the question says is pinned- so the answer the test wants is not the answer the question asks. The video in week 4 is terrible, and doesn't really effectively answer the question associated with it.