JL
Jan 2, 2021
非常好, 大力讚! 引起我閱讀原著的興趣! 除了 "朱熹" 那課, 其餘都不難理解, 教授們都很能做到深入淺出. 特別喜歡燕教授的寓例於詩. 另, 孫子兵法那課, 如果能夠舉出歷代戰爭實例 與以說明, 那就更無敵了. 謝謝大家, 感恩感恩. 祝大家身體健康, 為傳承及普及中國文化 再繼續努力
MW
Jul 21, 2016
I learnt a lot and have enjoyed the course. Than you all the teachers!
By Shawn G
•Mar 16, 2016
《心经》和王阳明心学两个部分比较难,其他课程难度不会很大。感谢老师的辛苦付出。可能是因为公开课,所以整体课程难度不是很大,内容需要自己另外学习的比较多。
By Nisdark.Tsang
•Nov 2, 2016
一个比较正式的导读,可以引导对中国传统哲学思想感兴趣的人入门,然后根据老师的指导再进一步去找原典来阅读,将会有较大的提高。
By Jessica W
•Aug 20, 2015
除了程朱理学那课基本上听不懂意外,别的课程都有收获。
个别老师的普通话不是很标准,但是没有关系,知识还是在那里的
By li h
•Aug 16, 2015
的确是导读,讲的比较浅,但是可以引起兴趣,继续深入学习。个人比较喜欢讲老庄的韩鹏杰老师
By ying z
•Dec 23, 2020
个别老师口音有点重啊,听起来有点费劲,从导读的角度来看,还是脉络清晰的。
By 谢玉珊
•Apr 13, 2021
挺好的,有几个老师非常有意思,让我获益匪浅,解决了多年前的一些疑惑
By 谢春阳
•Dec 16, 2016
老师讲的通俗易懂,作为导读课程很有启发性,不错
By Jackie I
•Mar 5, 2020
很好的课程,每一个中华儿女都应该学习一下。
By 林宛儒
•Sep 3, 2015
哲学入门很好的导读,如果有内容延伸就更好了
By 洪志瑋
•Aug 17, 2015
滿實用的基礎的入門課程
By Fok s k
•Feb 22, 2016
A little boring. Some lecturers did not deliver a good presentation and some "philosophical masterpiece" are not practical at all.
By hitanya
•Apr 16, 2020
对于从头至尾梳理中国古代的思想是非常有益的,但有些章节的内容写得晦涩难懂,加大了哲学导读入门的难度。但也有部分章节非常非常清晰好懂,读起来畅快明白,比如易经,心经,和庄子这三章非常好读易懂。
By Cissy Z
•Dec 10, 2016
This serves well as a basic intro but not for people who are looking for a deeper dive.
By 范鹏云
•Feb 23, 2016
讲道德经和庄子的韩鹏杰老师很好,引经据典、联系现实,没有废话,让我对道德经产生了浓厚的兴趣。讲儒家思想的几个老师都比较一般,照本宣科,口音很重
By Ping Z
•Sep 26, 2016
Some profs are very good, some are terrible. The terrible ones need to improve their teaching skills and even language skills. As a native Chinese speaker, I find some of the lectures very boring.
Good lectures are clear, concise, and right to the point.
Good teachers make the learning experience effortless and fun, poor teachers make it like a torture.
By Menghan Y
•Sep 10, 2015
Really far from the courses by NTU...quite disappointed.
By Liu C
•Jan 30, 2016
有些讲师比较啰嗦。
By Shawn L
•Feb 20, 2018
As a native Chinese, i knew more or less a little bit of Chinese classic works. but in this MOOC: there is no critique, the tutor granted Chinese classic works good; there is no academic attitude, the tutor referred "comments on the works" from quite a lot famous western thinkers, philosophers, unbelievable they didn't verify the genuineness of the comments, which is just low-esteemed Chinese folks invented to make themselves feel better; tutor also refer fictitious novelty as evidence on Sun military thoughts.
By Jia M
•Apr 17, 2017
Bad course. Things mentioned by the instructors are naive. According to my knowledge (my knowledge about Chinese philosophy come from A History of Chinese Philosophy, Youlan Feng; History of Chinese Philosophy, Sze-kwang Lao), that is not Chinese philosophy at all.