Tough course, but very informative.

suriani@mikroskil.ac.id

was a great experience

Amazing

The lectures were well done. The course material was very interesting and well-presented. However, there were more than one example of multiple-choice tests where the answers were shaded too close to one another. And as someone who has chosen to be self-employed (resumes and bosses are a thing of the past) -- and is not particularly spun up about grades assigned in the late summer of life -- I'm not nitpicking. Some of the multiple-choice quiz answers need to be reevaluated to determine, "what am I really trying to teach here in this question?" Overall, but for the very specific issue of multiple choices quiz answers in certain tests, the total takeaway was that this was an excellent course.

By giving one star less is mean that there are some issues with some questions and the given options but overall it’s a very good course.

The course itself was informative, but the wording of some questions in the quizzes leaves a lot to be desired.

Quizzez can be tricky and difficult. But the peer-review homework is interesting.

I am learning a lot. The courses are easy to understand.

Good course with lots to learn

The course is good for getting to know about the internal decision making and accounting processes for any company; but the course quizzes has many incorrect answers which have been reported in the discussion forums but still remain erroneous. The explanation has not been upto the mark as compared to the first 2 courses in the specialization cause earlier they actually consulted real business people to portray the concepts of accounting in a lay man's terms which is quite easier for the students to grasp; in this course the faculty just used a tele-prompter or just read through the presentations. This course can be a lot better than it is now.

I hate to give this course a 3 star because the content covered and peer assignments were interesting and I learnt a lot. I really loved the Managerial Accounting reading content. However the videos were not in par with the quizzes or reading content. The videos need to be a little more thorough and cover topics from the reading. After taking the first 2 courses in the series I was very dissapointed with this one.

There are problems with the quizzes that makes the learning experience into a guessing experience. So the whole thing is kind of frustrating. But the content presented is good.

The course is good that I have learned a lot, but the week number 2 exam is sort of difficult.

Thanks a lot Professor.

The concepts were not gone over as thoroughly as I would have likes for the type of questions that were asked

The Managerial Accounting course presents a mixed bag of learning experiences, with some notable strengths but also significant structural issues that impact its educational effectiveness. The peer assignments stand out as a highlight, offering students practical, real-world applications of managerial accounting concepts. These assignments challenge students to apply theoretical knowledge in realistic business scenarios, providing valuable hands-on experience that mirrors actual workplace demands. However, the course suffers from a concerning misalignment between learning materials and assessments, particularly in modules 3 and 4. The quiz and test questions frequently cover material that is conspicuously absent from both the lectures and assigned readings. This disconnect creates an artificial barrier to learning, forcing students to engage in counterproductive behaviors such as repeated test attempts and rote memorization of answers, rather than developing a genuine understanding of the subject matter. The assessment strategy's shortcomings are particularly disappointing given the course's position within the broader educational organization's portfolio. When compared to other courses from the same provider, this managerial accounting course falls notably short of the established standard of quality. This disparity suggests that the issues are specific to this course's design rather than reflecting a systemic problem across the organization's curriculum. While the course succeeds in creating engaging peer-learning opportunities that effectively bridge theory and practice, its fundamental flaws in content alignment significantly diminish its overall educational value. The disconnect between instructional materials and assessments creates an unnecessary obstacle to learning, ultimately preventing students from fully benefiting from what could otherwise be a valuable educational experience in managerial accounting.

The concepts are good but the delivery is quite dry. Very hard to pass the quizes, as there are no analogies or examples in the videos - just theory. I did not enjoy this course as much as I did the first two in the programme.

Bring back Kevin from the first two courses! Kevin challenged me based on the <<CONTENT>> of the course and I learned the content as a result of being challenged in that way.

Gary.. oh Gary.. your content is lifeless in comparison and the challenge from your course is based on the <<QUIZ FORMAT>> and how easy it is to lose my patience when the only way to pass the module exams are to write down every single question that comes up. Of course, the answers you submit (because the majority of questions have you select all that apply) get covered up BUT don't give you partial points for the Select All Applicable questions.

It took four or five attempts for me to pass Module 2. There are 18 questions on the exam and yet I have a list of 36 questions from the test bank pool. Good luck on what to tell Sharon, I have no clue what to tell her and I'm pretty sure that no one else does either. If I could give this course 0 Stars then I would. This course doubts my ability to be stubborn and power through to the end of this specialization as Gary makes his reapperance in Course 4.

bad bad bad dont take it