PR
Aug 10, 2019
Great way to practically learn a lot of stuff. Sometimes, a lot of it starts to go over head. But, it is completely worth the learning curve! Definitely recommend it!
AJ
Jun 7, 2021
The lack of synchronization between the videos and labs is extreme in this course, but the lectures are excellent and the subject area covered is very broad.
By Печатнов Ю
•Nov 22, 2018
First quiz is very bad
But totally the course is interesting and I like it :)
By Deepika
•Jan 21, 2020
Felt somewhat advanced learning, which made tough to complete intime
By hemant k
•Dec 1, 2018
Very informative, very much useful to my ongoing work on NLP.
By Nicolas S
•May 29, 2020
Great course, but no more up to date with TF2
By Kumar U
•May 18, 2020
Code explanation can be more elaborate
By borja v
•Jul 22, 2019
Complex but interesting
By Matthias D
•Jun 29, 2020
L
By Tiffany K
•May 30, 2020
Not the best course. I think there are much better courses on Time series modeling here on coursera. The platform for the labs is also cumbersome.
By David O
•Oct 8, 2020
Labs didn't work as expected. Too may errors due to incompatible tensorflow versions.
Quizzes are poorly constructed.
Frustrating experience!
By Noah M
•Jul 6, 2020
Practice material (notebooks) didn't match the video lectures, but the course itself was good
By Soroush A
•Jul 30, 2019
lecturer talks too fast and not easy to understand. This topic was one of my favorites.
By Farzad K
•Feb 26, 2021
The files in the labs are not the same as the ones explained in the solutions.
By ssen-advanced
•Nov 6, 2019
The chinese intonation and pronunciation was uncomfortable
By Michael S S
•Mar 18, 2021
Some the exercises were too easy to complete.
By Rubens Z
•Jun 20, 2020
I need more advanced Labs
By Ali S
•May 11, 2020
The content was very general and the code specifics were not reviewed. It was like primarily Google Cloud advertising.
By Mustafa H K
•Aug 26, 2020
Labs and quizes are poor and mere formality. You can pass this course without actually learning a single thing.
By Vlad B
•Jun 6, 2021
A lot of the labs were repetitive and had no / little connection to the lectures
By José C L A
•Jun 13, 2020
Excpected more. Also Katherine Zhao sloooow voice makes it tedious and boring
By Daniel P
•Feb 21, 2021
Just one question per evaluation. Labs seems outdated
By Harriet S
•Sep 24, 2023
The course is designed for professionals. It explains NOTHING. After each “lecture” I sat for 2 hours and searched Google for explanations. For example, I am given parts of “NLP solutions”, but it is not explained what “NLP solutions” are! I don't even understand what parts of what they are explaining to me. What is architecture? I know that there is Parisian architecture, Gothic architecture. Obviously we are talking about something else. But no one explained to me what we were talking about. And so on every step! It was indicated that the course was designed for people without training. Moreover, I am a linguist and understand natural languages much better than the authors of the course. And I can say that this course has nothing to do with natural languages. It only relates to the use of Google services, which work frankly poorly. Seriously, in my first lab I get a 404 error on every link? Do you think I will want to use Google services after this?
By Seth r
•Jun 16, 2020
This is one of the poorly taught course. Week 2 is very difficult to follow the accent of the instructor. Also the notebook did not have the right package for the poetry problem and the instructor used different environment. The final Diaglogflow problem the concepts are not explained well. The course may be revised so that the important aspect of Tensor2Tensor is expressed properly.
By Vivienne Z
•Mar 23, 2021
I wanted to unenroll but I can't for some reason.