Some interesting topics, but the weeks lack interconnectedness. Some topics are outdated, some videos unintelligible. Week 8 is especially disappointing because it lacks any kind of actionable material on the important topic of managing people.

I like the course in general. To some extent, it was very theoretical. The assignments were very good. There was no reference to platforms, which is a critical aspect of innovation management, and very few links to external content.

Thank all teachers for good job!

The only drawback is the lack of people who can rate your assignments and whose assignments you can rate. The less people are in the course, the more time it takes to finish the course.

Quite theoretical and more like an introduction to Innovation Management. Lack of concrete examples. No interaction with peers (perhaps add group assignments?). The format could be a bit more dynamic.

The course is okay. I would have wished to gain more pracical skills. It is a good opportunity to understand the language of innovation and to be able to take the next step.

The course was about what I expected. I wasn't wow'ed though. Also, in some of the videos, I dodn't understand the teacher very well. I would rate this as an average class.

Great content, very engaging and helpful course. I just found some lecturers difficult to follow due to language limitations, otherwise I strongly recommend.

Course is good and very interesting, but extremely little interaction takes place in forums, especially not at all from the moderators.

Some of the information was really interesting. I don't feel that I have enough from this course info to manage innovation though

Some interesting material but overall the course lacks a connection with the viewer. The presenters are definitely scripted.

Good content (except for the introductions and closures). It would be nice to have more content.

Have very good lecturer but some hard to understand

Great course, but too bulky.

Second half was better

Great course

It does not fully utilize the power and possibilities of a MOOC (students cannot study at their own pace, there is no live interaction, standard quizes and assignments), which is a bit ironic.

Peer-reviewing really brings down the quality of the feedback. Not everyone is capable of testing, evaluating and giving constructive feedback.

The videos are very static, the content good but the course progresses in a rather slow way.

The thick Dutch accent and the lack of diversity in the speakers profile is rather paramounting (but I have followed only the first three chapters).

The peer review assignments does not work as expected. It would be much appriciated if the course was converted to a quizz, so students doesn't waste time on a course where they don't get a grade because of missing reviews both ways.

From module 3 i could barely hear the lecturers

It lacks the option of completing ahead of the schedule as the graded assignments are locked till the due data