MR
Jul 15, 2017
Great course, I would recommend to everyone who wants to understand the basics of cloud computing. The course material is excellent, the instructor Indy is phenomenal and the exams are marvelous.
DP
Oct 6, 2016
This instructor is fantastic. He is exceptionally thorough and his delivery is very good as well. This is a course definitely worth taking if you are interested in learning more about the cloud.
By Raul K
•Mar 31, 2023
Theoretical part is about some cloud computing protocols and the level of discussions is not aimed well - some parts are given in a lot of detail, but some iformation is not explained enough. It is not clear why such general discussions have to be combined by requirement to write quite technical programs in C++
By Rachana N A
•Dec 3, 2016
The concepts are explained very well. The only issue was the Programming assignment, which could have been more descriptive. Also, they could've given us the option of choosing a programming language.
By Tao Z
•Feb 26, 2017
The course contents are composed of some superficial concepts of cloud computing. And the code framework for programing assignment written in c++ is probably the worst kind of code I've ever seen.
By Patrick B
•Apr 24, 2020
The course is interesting, however, advanced templated C++ code is far too heavy for most. I've dropped the class as I'm not even going to attempt the assignments after viewing the first one.
By Bingqing M
•Sep 23, 2018
I do like the material and lectures but the huge problem is there is no TA or platform like Piazza to ask questions. I think it would be nice to just have a TA or advisor to answer questions
By Tao H
•Sep 7, 2020
It would have been more helpful to include some more examples for quiz questions. Adding some tutorial materials (or links) in setting up environment would also be greatly appreciated.
By Ben N
•Jul 8, 2018
This is not about cloud computing but distributed systems. Feels like a bait and switch. This is not what I was looking to learn (because I've already done that!)
By Darko C
•Sep 15, 2019
Homeworks are too much work, Proving that you know concepts should be done few times, not 5 times for each one.
By Raul K
•Dec 8, 2017
It is alright. I was expecting some higher quality though. I do not recommend it.
By Mogahed M K Y
•Mar 22, 2020
I don't have more time to study but it will be in future
By Darren
•Dec 18, 2017
It's too difficult to me. But the interview is good
By Srini
•Jul 18, 2020
Some content is legacy.
By Dawei C
•Mar 30, 2018
This course is totally not for the beginner, even you pass the prerequisite with 100% score easily.
I understand the distributed algorithms could be hard, but the instructor didn't seem to teach in a beginner-friendly way, he just read the PPT without emphasis. In my opinion, this course should just be a little harder than the Algorithm course. (BTW, I couldn't find another alternative yet, maybe other people could suggest.)
Just as lots of other reviewers mentioned, the C++ Gossip assignment is really a mess for a non-C++-expert, even you are an experienced non-C++ programmer.
Hope I could pass this course after I gain lots of insights from other places in the future.
By zh c
•Jul 21, 2019
Actually this course contains decent material, as long as you don't pay for homework and programming assignment. The homework and final test ask about very detail of a concret implementation, instead of some concept or idea. When it comes to vector timestamp/unicast/multicast, the cases presented in the tests and homeworks are presented in an unnecessarily complicated way. Also the starting code in the programming assignment is written in a bad way, both in codeing style and design decision, and takes you more time to get started with it.
Basically I like the course content. But I won't recommend you to pay for the homework/programming assignment.
By Vitaliy G
•Aug 5, 2016
The course is not for beginners and WinForm lovers. This is real re-branding yourself. I would say path to reborn to what real open source world is living in. Low or no help from course instructor, community or google. Course comes in huge amount of concentrated videos. 7 hardest assignments. I would give up on the beginning but commitment is top of all. I respect anyone who has completed.
By Mark S B
•Nov 27, 2016
Course lectures don't seem to match up with the questions on the quiz. It is also not clear if the typed in answers are not read by the program correctly or if the answers do not match what the instructor is looking for, in any case the 3 weeks quiz is very difficult to figure out.
By Tushar G
•Sep 2, 2018
The response time at discussion forums are disappointing! It'd be helpful, if Mentors could be prompt at resolving doubts. Moreover, I felt that the programming assignment was poorly documented.
By Qiankun X
•Jun 22, 2016
the test is terrible and teacher is just reading the ppt. boring
By ECS159_SWARUP M
•Jun 9, 2021
did not sign up to learn WSLfor win 10 or linux
By John P
•Aug 17, 2023
Too complicated for me.
By Yiqing L
•Feb 26, 2020
very hard
By Ayoub M
•Sep 23, 2016
The slides are unclear and very very ugly and old style.
The assignment is very specific to Linux based machine.
Only one programming assignment.
More theory than practices.
The QCMs don't really help understand. They are just about remembering values.
I woudn't recommande this course since it is more like a book then it is like a course.
By Sumit S
•Nov 1, 2022
The course has a lot of content which the instructors read from the slides. Nothing exciting happens.
I got excited about the final assignment, and it turned out to be the C code using void pointers and all kinds of obfuscated code. No clarity on what needs to be done.
By Telma M
•Sep 10, 2020
To be honest I could not finish the course. The lecture speaks to fast and I never had time to think about what I was listening to and get the information settled. I had to give up in the second week! That's a pity!
By Anik C
•Jun 9, 2018
Extremely boring with lots of academic stuffs. I am totally disappointed. Even the instructior fails to make the course interactive. The course materials are not good enough.